🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an charming small “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense discussion over their fate often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the struggling amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed warned to euthanize them unless the government covers the cost of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer discovered personally.

Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so amazed by the subtleties and unique traits in their characters. She cultivated a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “Both altered the way I understand connection.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a context of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the facility links to age-related causes, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The park did not open to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and constant care than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in early March following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected particulars of the incident were leaked to the press and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She backs calls for the whales to be taken immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a proposal to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the request would have meant a perpetual life in confinement and a return to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As society, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience permit an transfer that would continue the conditions these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a broader incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As officials struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The planned facility, which includes extensive space of protected cove, is not yet built. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

The project lead, director of the plan, said the site will replicate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|